What I Expect of My Agent Relationship (Oh no you didn’t!?!)

Direct quotes from younger actors:

“I’ve always known that if I was really interested in acting, at some point I would have to actually learn what an agent is, in the same way I knew that some point during my adolescence I would inevitably need to have my wisdom teeth pulled…”

“My attitude towards agents is… I just see them as a hindrance to my goal, rather than a tool to help me achieve my dream.”

“I expect my agent to contact me with projects that I may not be exactly right for.”

“What I want my agent to be like is a Queen Latifah style character – friendly, big, fun and trustworthy. I don’t know what Queen Latifah is like in person but my imagination is that she’s kind and honest… someone who offers coffee or tea.”

Oh. Good. God.

The day was not a happy one when I read the statements above. I had given college students of mine — at one of the many institutions that I teach — an assignment. They were to write a 200 – 400 word essay entitled; ‘What I Expect of My Relationship with An Agent’. Then the students were to read the three chapters on agents in ACTING: Make It Your Business and write another essay about their expectations of their relationship with an agent.

Many of the ‘before’ essays contained the unrealistic expectations expressed above. Most detailed that their only reference of agents was what they had seen on screen as portrayed by actors (oh, the blind leading the blind).

Of the 100 plus essays read I soon discovered that some students, prior to reading the agent chapters, undoubtedly had no clue as to what an agent is and/or does.

“I’ll talk to them on the phone sort of the way that I’ll talk to a receptionist at a dentist’s office, only I’ll know them better.”

(Don’t expect a lollipop after each visit.)

“I kind of figure you go into an agent’s office (once you’ve already acquired said agent) and let them know the specific kind of work you’re interested in. In my case this would be film, preferably non-comedy (super-hero would be great).”

(What’s frightening about the above statement is that the issuer is old enough to drive, drink and shoot a gun.)

“I would also want my agent to be part of an agency who is bicoastal, if not more coastal than that.”

(Does she want an agent in every port? Also, unless you’re Mitt Romney an agency is not a ‘who’ but a ‘that.’)

To be fair I could understand the naïveté of these young talents who barely knew the difference between an open call and a meet-n-greet. Back when I was a 24 year-old actor I knew nothing of agents, casting directors or how to go about the business of our business other than reading trades and showing up to advertised open calls. Today what shocks me is a prevalent theme of  ‘me-itis’ found in neophyte actors’ ‘before’ and ‘after’ visions of representation:

“I expect a lot of individual attention from my agent.”

“An agent gets 10% commission, and is therefore only responsible for 10% of my career.”

(Oh you selfish, selfish slough.)

“I want my agent to give me feedback from all the auditions.”

(Good luck. Do you think casting has the time to respond to agents for every actor per project?! Get a reality check. Fast.)

On one of the papers I circled every occasion the actor-student began a sentence with “I expect” and “I want”: 20 plus occurrences. There was a rapid contagion of “me, me, me” running like a virus through every class I led. Where was the ‘we’ of the relationship? I asked many of the actor-students, “Other than the 10% commission you pay to the agent, what else do you bring to the relationship?” Emphasis on ’relationship’ because that’s what an actor working with an agent is–a union. I.e. marriage.

I was heartened by the small percentage of actor-students – who after reading the chapters on agents in which agents and actors discuss their relationships – that some view points became more universally aware rather than introspective with a spotlight.

“On the first page of Chapter 12 what struck me most was “A talent rep faces more defeats in a single hour than one actor does in a month.” This helped me think about who becomes an agent. Not only are they enduring such drastic rejection but also their pay checks are not guaranteed to be lucrative.”

(She’s dead-on correct with both statements. Particularly the last. I know of agents — at respected agencies with working clients — who have gone weeks and months without pay. These champions of their clients put the solvency of the agency first before their own needs.)

“After reading the quorum of agents, I realized that there are agents who truly care about actors and the art they create. While the agent is absolutely responsible for submitting you for all projects they think you’re right for, you still have to remember your job as a salesperson (of yourself, that is) is never done – always keep marketing yourself! Agents are not all Ari Golds and they work hard just like you do.”

“I had forgotten that they only take 10% commission so unless they have lots of big name clients they’re living about as comfortably as you are.”

“I have a better understanding of specific behaviors to avoid – behaviors that imply a lack of trust and loyalty. For example, a client should make sure to call the agent only for good specific reasons and NOT to tell the agent, “I saw that ‘blank’ project is looking for a blonde with blue eyes.”

But then despite my best intentions to instill upon the up-and-coming thespians the value of the ‘we’ in the agent/actor relationship I must have failed somewhere as shown by the following statement handed in AFTER the student read the chapters on agents:

“After reading the chapters I have some new insights to the agent process. An early one being that an agent doesn’t receive more than 10% of earnings ever. That’s a relief.”

One student though summed up succinctly the healthiest outlook for ‘What I Expect of My Relationship with An Agent’:

“You should trust your agent – that he or she is really trying to get you seen by casting directors/people…. The agent doesn’t do all the work. The actor must also be looking for auditions.”

“An agent isn’t a piñata of job offers that you hit up for candy when things are getting stale.”

“An agent is your cheerleader, not your bitch.”

Well said.

My best,
Paul

Bookmark and Share

<a href=”http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=&title=”&gt;StumbleUpon.com
E-mail This Post to a Friend or Two…

Paul Russell’s career as a casting director, director, acting teacher and former actor has spanned nearly thirty years. He has worked on projects for major film studios, television networks, and Broadway. Paul has taught the business of acting and audition technique at NYU and has spoken at universities including Yale, Temple and the University of the Arts. He writes a column for Back Stage and is the author of ACTING: Make It Your Business – How to Avoid Mistakes and Achieve Success as a Working Actor. For more information, please visit www.PaulRussell.net.

 

Get One-On-One:

Get Work:

Get The Feed:

Classes with Paul Russell Paul's book ACTING: Make It Your Business!

Answers For Actors Feed

Visit Paul @ PaulRussell.net and/or:

Paul  Russell on Facebook Paul  on Twitter Paul on  MySpace

Fair Wages? Are Actor Unions Fairly Serving All Actors?

“The only real way for us to lower costs is to pay artists less, but paying artists is part of the point of the Public,”

Oskar Eustis
Artistic Director – The Public
New York Times Interview – 4/15/2010

There’s been an alarming shift towards lower actor wages within the unions. And the membership of AEA and SAG have been complacent in letting their union reps negotiate less compensation in return for a producer’s promise of expanded employment opportunities. The sweet success winners are the producers. Actors oft remain holding the fuzzy end of the lollipop stick. It’s complacent thespians who are to blame for receivership of the less-than-attractive reward.

SAG began the trend of creating contracts with salary stipends that wouldn’t bust a producer’s budget; SAG Experimental, SAG Modified Low Budget and SAG Ultra-Low Budget. (You begin to wonder when comes the SAG Happy Meal Low Budget?) These contracts were intended for use by the indie film producer. But major studios could not resist the temptation of exploiting these contracts for their own best profitable interests. Paranormal Activity anyone? A mega-hit produced for about $10,000 and grossing for Paramount’s DreamWorks division $22 million (that’s box office alone… DVD and television air-sales not included). The actors’ miniscule salary in the shaking-cam screamer was a small, small percentage of that $10,000.

You do the math of fair and balanced.

Then not long ago AEA leadership in negotiations with producers began devising their own similar sounding paltry payouts; AEA Experimental and the new S.E.T. acronym. The latter contract of which is now being implemented by the theatrical titans; the Weisslers. What’s this new contract? It’s the Short Engagement Touring Agreement. Terms of which went into effect January 5, 2009. How does this new contract affect actors? Let’s take a gander… at an actual situation.

An actor (we’ll tag her as ‘Janice’) was touring as an ensemble member with the long-enduring tour of Chicago produced by National Artists Management Company (i.e. Fran & Barry Weissler). Under past tour contracts with Chicago Janice received a salary of $1,500 per week. The tour went well. Janice made a nice bit of cha-ching for her savings account as did the producers. Then the tour closed as scheduled. Not long after it was remounted to go out across the mountains and prairies once more but under the new S.E.T. contract. Janice was offered to return. Same duties. Salary, $850 per week.

Now, some may say this is not entirely fair. While others may view this as a way for actors and producers to keep producing art in an economy that, as past recessions have shown, is not favorable to the arts.

And it’s not just ‘the economy’ influencing earnings.

As thespians, especially the musically-talented, know AEA employ on the road has been usurped by non-union tours. For awhile AEA appeared baffled for finding a way to stop the loss of employ for its members to the lower overhead, cost-attractive, non-union tours that producers like the Wiesslers licensed out to non-union touring companies. AEA was less-than-brilliant in defense by asking its members to include in their Playbill bios; “Proud member of Actors’ Equity Association”. If that was the best AEA leadership could do to battle, then those actors running the actor’s union don’t understand their audience. The people in the seats could care less about union affiliation. All they care about is what’s on stage before them and how much did it cost to sit and view. If the production and actors look like their interpretation of what a Broadway show on tour should be, and costs far, far, far less than a Broadway hundred-dollar plus ticket; they’re happy. And I’ve seen several of those non-union tours. If I weren’t the picky Virgo I am and was just your average Sagittarius from Scranton I wouldn’t know the difference — on stage — between union and non-union. The uneducated-in-the-arts would just know that they saw a great show that didn’t cost him this month’s car payment. And that he’d have money left over afterwards for wings and beer at Hooters.

So now AEA has found a way to combat the non-union tour at its heart; the bottom line. Who gets caught in the cross-fire? Actors. Both union and non-union. AEA members are now being paid less for the same work labored previously under higher wages. Non union actors may begin seeing less non-union tour opportunities. And this is a trend that began years ago with SAG. What can union actors unhappy do about the less-than-living wage wages? Get involved with your union. Voice your opinion. Get on the boards that negotiate contracts. Rally. Scream. Demand.

If you feel that these changes in contracts are necessary to ensure that there is some form of employ then do similar as those opposed to the wage and contract concessions. Be heard.

What does the non-union actor do? You demand from non-union producers the same earnings, treatment and contract perks (Per Diem, hours, etc) as given to your union card-carrying brethren. Will you get such? HA! (Good luck.) But the more non-union performers continue to ask for equality — the more the producer hears the same requests — then the more likely that the producer (if humane) may change their mind to remain contractually competitive in attracting quality, professional talent.

To all; your silence equals complicity. Be heard.

Upcoming Posts: Coming soon over the few weeks will be “How to Piss-off a Casting Director (Without Being Seen)”, “An Actor Derails Representation”, “Life Titles” and many more including a very personal post I wrote (but never published) back in the fall of ’09 entitled “?”.  If you’re a subscriber already to Answers for Actors you won’t miss a single post (unless abducted — or in Stephen Hawkins’ sci-fi scenario — eaten by aliens). If you’re not already a subscriber whata ya waitin’ for? Choose one of the three feed options on the upper right hand menu bar.

Next!

My Best,
Paul

Bookmark and Share

<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=&title=”&gt;StumbleUpon.com
E-mail This Post to a Friend or Two…

Paul Russell’s career as a casting director, director, acting teacher and former actor has spanned nearly thirty years. He has worked on projects for major film studios, television networks, and Broadway. Paul has taught the business of acting and audition technique at NYU and has spoken at universities including Yale, Temple and the University of the Arts. He writes a column for Back Stage and is the author of ACTING: Make It Your Business – How to Avoid Mistakes and Achieve Success as a Working Actor. For more information, please visit www.PaulRussell.net.

 

Get One-On-One:

Get New Insights:

Get The Feed:

Classes with Paul Russell Paul's book ACTING: Make It Your Business!

Answers For Actors Feed

Visit Paul @ PaulRussell.net and/or:

Paul    Russell on Facebook Paul    on Twitter Paul on    MySpace