Agent Ready or Not

Are You Agent Ready?

Wait!

You may already have an agent. If so, this post is also for you. Just like the chapter Agents: Keeping One from ACTING: Make It Your Business you might pick up something new.

When I first began doing Access to Agents the focus was on providing actors new insights on improving techniques for marketing and auditioning. The agent panel was meant as a perk. An additional form of feedback for the actors about their abilities  and marketability with agents. Some actors have happily been signed for the first time in their careers. While other actors — believing themselves to be paradigms of representation worthy — were far from being agent ready. Just because you think you can act plus have a headshot and resume doesn’t mean that you’re agent ready.

Below is a questionnaire which will give insight to your readiness and/or compatibility for an agent. The individual questions are based upon my extensive conversations with agents and behavioral therapists. While none of the following is based on an exact science it may, for some, be enlightening. For others; it may just cause frustration, anger and screaming obscenities at me via your screen.

Because WordPress does not allow technological craftiness with a self-calculating form you’ll need the following:

  1. Something (like paper & pen or a computer) to record your answers.
  2. Basic math skills.

After reading each question, answer immediately without pondering a response. Being true to your gut reaction is the only honest way to do this. When you choose your answer, record the letter chosen per question on whatever device you’re keeping score. Ready?

Remember… answer immediately. No pondering. No cheating!

Go…!

1. A couple is waiting for a table at a crowded restaurant. A party of four – which placed their names with the host after the couple arrived – are seated before the couple. Why did this happen? (Record your answer)

a. The party of four probably paid-off the host to be seated quicker.
b. The host was being rude and/or incompetent.
c. The party of four would make the restaurant more money.
d. The party of two must wait for a table that sat only two people.

2. What is the proper response time by a business to an e-mail inquiry? (Record your answer)

a. Two hours
b. Eight hours
c. Twelve hours
d. Twenty-four hours

3. A waiter took Penny’s order then served Penny her salad and appetizer but the waiter’s shift ended before bringing out Penny’s entrée and dessert. Another server served Penny her entrée and desert. Who gets the tip? (Record your answer)

a. Neither waiter. Management should have had placed Penny at a table with a waiter whose shift would not end in mid-meal.
b. The waiter who took the order and served the first portions of the meal.
c. The waiter who took over for the waiter who departed
d. Both waiters deserve to be tipped equally.

4. Janet had an offer to attend a concert with one of her friends but the tickets were for nose-bleed section seats. Janet also got an offer to attend the same concert with her boss in seats that were front row. What should Janet do? (Record your answer)

a. Take the better seats with the boss, schmooze, and give an excuse to the friend.
b. Accept both offers in case one of the two fell through.
c. Politely decline both offers because if either the boss or friend discovered the mutual offers the situation would not be good for Janet.
d. Accept the offer of the lesser attractive seats.

5. A partner/spouse arrives home several hours later than normal. Their other half is justified with a reaction of: (Record your answer)

a. Suspicion
b. Enui
c. Distrust
d. Concern

6. James has played baseball since he was in grade school and is extremely enthusiastic about the game. He is now on his high school’s baseball team. His batting average is .225. It’s the last inning of the last game of the season with the score tied. The player who would normally bat next is in the locker room vomiting. The coach has a choice; James or Ronald. Ronald is not as enthusiastic as James is but has a batting average of .275. What should the coach do? (Record your answer)

a. Choose James for his enthusiasm.
b. Talk to both James and Ronald to find out who is the more hungry for the opportunity.
c. Flip a coin. Heads for James. Tails for Ronald.
d. Choose Ronald.

Now time for some arithmetic:

– For each time you answered with the letter “a” give yourself 15 POINTS.

– For each time you answered with the letter “b” give yourself 10 POINTS.

– For each question you answered with the letter “c” give yourself 5 POINTS.

– For each question you answered with the letter “d” give yourself 1 POINT.

Now add them up….

What did you get?

If you got 70 – 90 points:

You are so not ready to have a healthy relationship with an agent. You lack trust that someone will work on your behalf without constant supervision. Your allegiance is also questionable. Plus you lean towards being an opportunist who believes enthusiasm and networking, over ability, should be the deciding factors in advancing one’s career.

If you got 30 – 69 points:

There are troublesome indicators of insecurity as to whether or not you’re capable of giving up some control and allowing others to work for your best interests without your constant need for reassurance. You may also believe that you are sometimes more deserving for being recognized over others who are more qualified.

If you got 6 – 29 points:

You’re agent ready (if talent and marketability against competition truly exists within you and your product).

You’re trusting of others to work on your behalf. You don’t need constant contact and reassurance. You lean towards the reality of casting that’s it’s not always you who deserves to be cast; there are many variables as to why someone else got the job including being a better choice than you. You also have a stronger allegiance to relationships than to using people to advance your own agenda.

====

The scores and your responses are based upon how you react in your life with relationships. If you’re not thrilled by the final score you received; don’t be pissy with me. You’re the one who chose your answers. Look back at your responses and look in the mirror.

Also, did you answer the questions as exactly stated or did you, like some of my  university students who took this test, insert mental variables? What’s a mental variable? One aspiring actress not thrilled with what she chose as an answer to the concert question justified her response with an inane argument about a hot dog stand… Excuse me? Concessions were never mentioned in the question.

How The Responses Reflected You:

All of the answer “A” responses (with the exception of question 6) trend towards a personality that is self-involved. Someone who does not see themselves within the world around them but sees the world as it revolves around them. In regard to answering “A” for question six; the respondent chooses not the best, talented person for the situation but gives responsibility to the less qualified. As an actor, one need realize that they cannot be the best choice for every role.

Answers “B” to “C” for all the questions lean towards indecisive and insecure personalities. Confidence in yourself and those who work on your behalf is needed to successfully survive the long journey in both the arts and life.

Answer “D” to all questions lent themselves towards personalities that are universalist. Meaning; they see the world around them, know their place in it as they share space with others and give beyond themselves. The “D” responses also reflect people who are secure within their abilities and can easily trust others.

To truly be agent ready (in NY or LA) an actor must be:

  • Trusting
  • Honest about both faults and strengths within themselves.
  • Have a talent that can successfully compete in the high-caliber Broadway, L.O.R.T. theatrical and LA screen markets.
  • Be emotionally mature

Everyone wants something in their life whatever that something is (as in this case an agent). Success at achieving such will not happen unless one is fully prepared and ready. And most of all; completely honest with themselves.

Special Note: My congrats to M. Sample, A. Miles, B.  McHugh, C. Kellogg and C. DeLanie the most recent Access to Agents participants to land agents through the seminar! The last non-musical version of Access to Agents for the season will be June and is now registering. Alex Butler (Henderson / Hogan), Chris Nichols (Kerin-Goldberg & Associates) and Jack Menashe (President – Independent Artists) will be the panel of agents the class will prep and audition for. Seats have been swiftly snatched by actors who were our wait list. A few seats remain. They go fast. Details & registration here.

My Best,
Paul

Bookmark and Share

<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=&title=”&gt;StumbleUpon.com
E-mail This Post to a Friend or Two…

Paul Russell’s career as a casting director, director, acting teacher and former actor has spanned nearly thirty years. He has worked on projects for major film studios, television networks, and Broadway. Paul has taught the business of acting and audition technique at NYU and has spoken at universities including Yale, Temple and the University of the Arts. He writes a column for Back Stage and is the author of ACTING: Make It Your Business – How to Avoid Mistakes and Achieve Success as a Working Actor. For more information, please visit www.PaulRussell.net.

 

Get One-On-One:

Get New Insights:

Get The Feed:

Classes with Paul Russell Paul's book ACTING: Make It Your Business!

Answers For Actors Feed

Visit Paul @ PaulRussell.net and/or:

Paul  Russell on Facebook Paul  on Twitter Paul on  MySpace

Returning Actors: A Not So Welcome Back…

On occasion I’ve received queries from readers who, for whatever reason, left the business in their youth and now — decades later — desire to make a return. (That’s your cue Ms. Desmond.) They look to me for an answer. I don’t know who fears my honesty more. I or them? Do I tread lightly in deference and respect to the years the inquirer has journeyed? Or do I ignore the truths I know and offer a white-wash, “All will be swell and easy for you” reply? Falsehoods and cautious courtesy will not serve the inquirers well.

There is a harsh reality awaiting these actors hoping to return to the thespian fold. They will not be welcomed back with warm embraces and adulation by hirers and representatives of talent. And if you believe I write these words with malicious glee you’d be terribly mistaken.

What follows is a correspondence between a hopeful, returning, ‘mature’ actor and myself. With the author’s permission I share it with you:

“Paul,

I have your book and just finished [the chapter] Training for the Actor. Every topic in that chapter was a question in my mind that you answered very well for anyone who is thinking about turning to acting as a career. I will intend to pursue a career in acting for film/television for which my undergraduate work was geared toward. The only thing is that undergraduate work was completed 33 years ago. I will retire with 31 years in the US Navy in the spring of 2011. I have thought about applying for grad school, but I will be 55 years old.

I am wanting to jump into being a “working” actor fast. I have the skills, rusty… If I was 23 again I’d probably would have tried the grad school pursuit and the MFA, now, I’m not sure what I should do. All I can put on a resume are the theater works I did back in the 1970s and my life experiences of traveling the world on ships, and being involved in a few major conflicts i.e. Hunt for Red October and Hurt Locker type stuff. I’m figuring I could have at another 20 or 30 year career. Your thoughts??”

Dear *****,

Thank you for the note.

To be fair to you, I’ve got to be as blunt here as I am in my book. But first before dispensing the bitter lemon I offer some lemonade; you’re making a brave move by returning to your love this many years later. Many people would not have the courage as do you. Bravo.

I wish I could say that your return will not have many obstacles but sadly there are two challenges that will not be easy to overcome. Firstly; your age. Secondly; your time away from the business.

You will be competing against men of your years who have remained in the business, who are well established, and have accrued respectable credits on Broadway, regionally and/or on screen. Your resume will not fair well against these peers.

Agents will not be as welcoming to you as they are to your experienced competition.  Nor embrace you as they do younger actors who can be developed. The latter — a well-known given — is that youth sells better in our society. Relatively, in comparison with roles 18 – 34, there are not many roles written for mature actors 50s plus (even less so for mature actresses). The older the actor, the harder the sell is by agents to casting; and producers to audience. I wish this were not true. But sadly such is the nature of the beast that is our business which is reflecting societal desires. I’ll never understand the folly fully myself. Why do the fields of entertainment and advertising target an audience that has little to no disposable income among its demographic while the more mature counterpart often has cash and credit easily at hand? To me this business plan seems like a contradictory move towards earning profit. But the business model must be working well or there would have been a change long ago. Who looses? Older actors, especially the ‘returning mature actor’. Unless an uber-celeb or an industry name the returning mature actor has a difficult journey in making measurable strides within the industry. (And so too often does the household-name, returning mature actor.)

As to your resume: Putting your life experiences on your resume, while deeply personal and rightfully important to you, will be of little interest for most agents and casting. Agents have enough trouble in this economy selling their established clients with Broadway and screen credits. Your admirable service in the military away from the entertainment industry provides too great a challenge for most agents in trying to sell you to casting. Casting wants to know what you have done lately that is directly relevant to acting. Agents need to provide recent relative information. Your military career can be utilized as leverage for military-type roles. But entertainment professionals will place perceptual limits on your abilities as an actor.

A civilian world example: If a baker in his twenties left his passion for cakes to pursue construction but then thirty years later wanted to return to baking and applied for a baker’s position at an upscale bakery the employer would not care how many buildings the ex-baker constructed but would want to know what has the builder has done recently relevant to baking. And what are his present culinary skills (including knowledge of customer trends and advancements in baking technology)?

Now yes, this can all be terribly demoralizing. This doesn’t mean there is no hope. Just realize, and I think you do, that you’re in for a tough, tough challenge in returning. Hence why I said you were very brave.

First best step that you can do is to attend training at a respected acting conservatory. You’ll be back in the business — somewhat — and begin to network among other actors. Actors get actors jobs.

Attend paid auditions to meet agents and casting people. I know of many actors who have gotten representation and/or work via these seminars. An agent or casting director will give more attention to an actor’s live presence than they will to an inert picture and resume in a mailing.

But please bear in mind that your desire for a ‘fast’ way to being a working actor is rarely an obtainable reality for any artist of story-telling. Whether an actor is new, established, youthful or mature, this business has very few express lanes.

My Best,
Paul

Update: After my reply to the actor I received a response. The actor was grateful for the honesty and stated their awareness and acceptance of the challenge that lay before them on the return journey.

I never want to deter any artist from pursuit of their desires. I want every actor to charge forward; not with false hope but with resolve to exceed expectations.

Bookmark and Share

StumbleUpon.com
E-mail This Post to a Friend or Two…

Paul Russell’s career as a casting director, director, acting teacher and former actor has spanned nearly thirty years. He has worked on projects for major film studios, television networks, and Broadway. Paul has taught the business of acting and audition technique at NYU and has spoken at universities including Yale, Temple and the University of the Arts. He writes a column for Back Stage and is the author of ACTING: Make It Your Business – How to Avoid Mistakes and Achieve Success as a Working Actor. For more information, please visit www.PaulRussell.net.

Get One-On-One:

Get New Insights:

Get The Feed:

Classes with Paul Russell Paul's book ACTING: Make It Your Business!

Answers For Actors Feed

Visit Paul @ PaulRussell.net and/or:

Paul Russell on Facebook Paul on Twitter Paul on MySpace